SA Financial Intermediary Forum

A Forum available for Intermediaries to raise, debate and source answers to any questions
 
HomeHome  CalendarCalendar  FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  
Welcome to the Intermediary Forum...please feel free to view, post and reply on any of the discussion topics. Registered members of the forum can download attachments and will receive mail correspondence, where and when relevant, on the various discussion topics.

Share | 
 

  Unhappy independent advisers call for action- blue chip journal 31 may 2011

Go down 
AuthorMessage
Forum Admin
Admin


Posts : 94
Join date : 2011-03-30
Age : 47
Location : Johannesburg

PostSubject: Unhappy independent advisers call for action- blue chip journal 31 may 2011   Tue May 31, 2011 11:58 am

Unhappy independent advisers call for action

Unhappiness among South African independent financial advisers with the way in which the Registrar of Financial Service Providers conducts business has reached bailing point and prompted them to seek the intervention of the Minister of Finance, calling for a commission of inquiry or the appointment of a special oversight committee.

In a statement last week the National Association of Independent Financial Advisers (NAIFA) announced that the organisation's board has petitioned the Minister of Finance, Pravin Gordhan requesting that a commission of inquiry or oversight committee be appointed to look into the conduct of the Registrar of Financial Service Providers, with respect to what they call certain decisions being made without adequate regard to the results of consultation with the industry.

“NAIFA was established in 2010 to serve the best interests of independent financial advisers by ensuring that the industry's rights are protected and that the longevity of this vital industry can be ensured,” said Chris van der Walt, a director of NAIFA.

“The need for an organisation such as this came about as a result of a combination of a more onerous regulatory environment, often without apparent purpose, and legacy issues where the image of independent financial advisers had been maligned,” he said.

“NAIFA has chosen to petition the Minister of Finance to address these issues as previous attempts to engage with the Registrar of Financial Service Providers were unsuccessful.

“This approach is in line with a strict internal procedure established by the NAIFA board to first attempt to exhaust all other alternatives before elevating a matter to the political arena. We feel this action best serves the needs of the industry and our members at this moment,” Van der Walt said.

Exam requirements

NAIFA's current petition to the Minister of Finance seeks to resolve issues surrounding proposed regulatory exam requirements for financial advisers and the establishment of an oversight committee to monitor the implementation of the objectives of the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act (FAISA) by the Registrar.

“Our main concerns around these matters pertain to provisions in subordinate FAISA legislation, which are not subject to parliamentary scrutiny and may infringe the individual rights of our members, with specific reference to the Determination of Fit and Proper Requirements for Financial Services Providers.

“We are also concerned that certain steps currently undertaken by the Registrar with respect to the first set of regulatory industry exams may adversely affect consumers and the economy as a whole, by possibly creating job losses as high as 300,000 at a time when increased employment is one of the highest priorities within Government” he said.

Industry support for NAIFA and the petition has grown steadily since launching and the organisation submitted a combined petition that included one initiated by NAIFA, covering all matters mentioned above, and the other that only relates to the regulatory exams.

The combined petition has in excess of 2,500 signatories and has also received support from trade union Solidarity, which supports the initiative from the perspective of civil rights and the potential for job losses.

“Trade union Solidarity supports the setting of standards in financial services, the concerns expressed in this petition as they relate to the enforcement of Fit and Proper Requirements for Financial Services Providers, the issue of language policies, the lack of a proper assessment of the impact of disintermediation on the industry and economy, and the establishment of an oversight committee,” Van der Walt said.

“Our aim with this action is to secure legal certainty as a basis on which to build the future of  independent financial advisers in this country, and join the Financial Services Board and the product providers to map out the industry's future over the short-, medium- and long-term.
“We are not against regulatory exams or the passing of legislation that will benefit the industry, we would just like to ensure that the proper consultation and interaction with the industry takes place to build sustainable businesses, and we hope this petition will finally enable that,” he said.
Back to top Go down
http://www.altrisk.co.za
 
Unhappy independent advisers call for action- blue chip journal 31 may 2011
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
SA Financial Intermediary Forum :: FAIS Act :: RE Exams :: News worth reading about-
Jump to: